Types of HRA for Washington Employers: A Practical Guide

When employers search for the types of HRA, they are usually trying to answer a practical question: how can we offer meaningful health benefits while keeping the budget predictable? A health reimbursement arrangement can help, but the right structure depends on your workforce, existing coverage, contribution strategy, and administrative capacity.

Book a conversation about your HRA options

What Are the Main Types of HRA?

A health reimbursement arrangement, or HRA, is an employer-funded benefit that reimburses employees for qualified medical expenses. Depending on the design, that may include individual health insurance premiums, deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other eligible costs. The employer establishes the arrangement, defines the contribution approach, and sets the rules for eligible expenses.

The main HRA categories serve different employer situations:

• Individual Coverage HRA (ICHRA): Employers of any size can use an ICHRA to reimburse individual health insurance premiums and eligible out-of-pocket expenses. Employees must have individual coverage to use the funds.
• Qualified Small Employer HRA (QSEHRA): This arrangement is designed for eligible small employers that do not offer group health coverage. Reimbursement limits apply, and eligible employees generally receive the same amount, subject to permitted family-size differences.
• Group Coverage HRA: Sometimes called an integrated HRA, this arrangement works alongside a traditional group health plan. It can reimburse deductibles or other out-of-pocket expenses allowed by the plan.
• Excepted Benefit HRA: An EBHRA is a narrower arrangement intended to help with certain excepted benefits and eligible expenses. It is not a replacement for full medical coverage.
• Retiree-only HRA: This type is designed for retiree health expenses and should be evaluated separately from an active-employee benefits strategy.

The important distinction is not simply the name of the HRA. It is how the arrangement interacts with individual or group coverage, which employees can participate, what the employer contributes, and how the plan is administered. The IRS overview of HRAs explains the federal framework, but current requirements can change. Employers should confirm the details for the applicable plan year before implementation.

How Does an ICHRA Work for Employers?

An ICHRA lets an employer provide tax-preferred funds for employees to purchase individual health insurance rather than offering one traditional group plan. The employer establishes a reimbursement amount, and employees use the benefit toward eligible individual coverage and approved medical expenses. The arrangement can reimburse Marketplace coverage or qualifying plans purchased outside the Marketplace.

One reason employers consider an ICHRA is control. There are no annual minimum or maximum contribution requirements for an ICHRA, so the employer can set a contribution approach that fits its budget and benefits strategy. That does not mean the design is informal. The reimbursement amount, eligibility rules, notice requirements, and expense definitions need to be established carefully.

Employees must have individual health insurance coverage to use ICHRA funds. An employer may also structure different contribution amounts for permitted employee classes, such as full-time and part-time workers or employees in different geographic areas. Class-based design can be useful for a Washington workforce with different roles, locations, or recruiting needs, but it must follow applicable nondiscrimination and group-size rules.

Affordability is another important consideration. For 2026 plans, employers should use the applicable federal calculation rather than a simple allowance comparison. The Healthcare.gov ICHRA guidance explains how an individual coverage HRA can affect Marketplace coverage and premium tax credit eligibility. Because the calculation depends on the employee’s household circumstances and the applicable plan details, employers should verify current figures before communicating an affordability result.

If an ICHRA offer is affordable, the employee and household members generally cannot claim a premium tax credit for Marketplace coverage. The calculation is specific, so an employer should not treat a simple allowance comparison as a complete affordability review.

For an employer, the appeal of an ICHRA is the ability to define a budget while giving employees more choice among individual plans. The tradeoff is that employee communication and plan administration must be handled well. Employees need to understand their coverage responsibility, reimbursement process, eligibility rules, and deadlines. A benefits advisor can help the employer evaluate whether that employee experience fits the organization.

When Does a QSEHRA Make Sense?

A QSEHRA is intended for eligible small employers that do not offer group health coverage to employees. It allows the business to reimburse eligible employees and, where applicable, family members for qualified medical expenses. That can include individual health insurance premiums, subject to the arrangement’s rules and annual limits.

The design is straightforward in one important way: the employer sets a reimbursement amount and must generally provide the same amount to all eligible employees. The amount may vary based on whether an employee has self-only or family coverage, but employers cannot casually create different allowances for favored groups. Annual dollar limits apply and are adjusted under federal rules, so current figures should be confirmed for the plan year rather than copied from an older article.

For a small Washington employer that does not want to sponsor a traditional group plan, a QSEHRA can create a defined benefits budget without requiring the business to select one group policy for everyone. Employees may gain flexibility in choosing individual coverage that fits their household needs. At the same time, the arrangement shifts more of the plan-selection responsibility to employees, which makes clear communication especially important.

A QSEHRA may be less suitable when the employer wants to offer group coverage, needs contribution flexibility across several employee classes, or has a workforce whose individual-market choices vary significantly by location. It is also not a way to layer an employer reimbursement benefit on top of an existing group health plan without reviewing the rules. The employer’s size, current coverage, contribution goal, and desired employee experience should be considered together.

The question is not whether a QSEHRA is automatically better than group coverage. The question is whether its eligibility and contribution structure match the employer’s current situation. The Healthcare.gov QSEHRA guide provides a useful starting point. Review the arrangement with a qualified advisor and confirm current federal requirements before announcing the benefit.

How Is a Group Coverage HRA Different?

A group coverage HRA is built to work with traditional group health coverage. Instead of giving employees money to purchase individual insurance, the employer offers a group plan and uses the HRA to reimburse approved expenses such as deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, or other out-of-pocket costs. The exact expenses and limits depend on the plan design.

This structure can help an employer address the employee experience created by a high deductible. The group plan remains the foundation of coverage, while the HRA provides an additional layer of support for eligible costs. An employer can use the arrangement to target a defined expense category or create a predictable reimbursement policy, subject to the applicable rules.

The contrast with an ICHRA is central. An ICHRA is tied to individual coverage and can replace the need for a traditional group plan for participating employees. A group coverage HRA supplements a group plan. The contrast with a QSEHRA is also important. A QSEHRA is intended for eligible small employers that do not offer group coverage, while a group coverage HRA is designed around the existence of that coverage.

Group coverage HRAs can be useful when an employer wants to keep a group network and benefits structure but give employees help with specific out-of-pocket costs. They require careful coordination with the underlying plan. Employers should define who is eligible, which expenses qualify, whether unused funds carry forward, and how reimbursements are documented. Employees should understand that the HRA is an employer benefit tied to the plan rules, not a personal bank account.

For Washington employers comparing HRA options, the practical decision is often about the balance between plan choice, network continuity, budget control, and administrative complexity. A group coverage HRA may fit a company that wants to preserve its group plan while making cost-sharing more manageable. An ICHRA or QSEHRA may fit a different coverage and workforce model.

HRA vs. HSA vs. FSA: What Is the Difference?

HRAs are often confused with HSAs and FSAs because all three can help employees pay eligible healthcare expenses. They are not interchangeable. The most important differences are who funds the account, who owns it, what coverage relationship applies, and what happens to unused funds.

Feature	HRA	HSA	FSA
Funding	Employer-funded	Employee, employer, or both, depending on the arrangement	Typically funded through employee salary reduction, with possible employer contributions
Ownership	Employer-owned arrangement	Employee-owned account	Employer plan account used for eligible expenses
Coverage relationship	Depends on type: individual coverage, group coverage, or a narrower purpose	Generally requires enrollment in a qualifying high-deductible health plan	Usually paired with an employer benefits program and subject to plan rules
Unused funds	May carry forward if the plan allows; remaining funds generally stay subject to employer plan rules	Belong to the employee and can remain with them after employment ends	May be subject to a grace period or limited carryover, depending on plan design

An HSA is the clearest ownership contrast. IRS guidance describes an HSA as the employee’s property, including after the employee changes employers or leaves the workforce. An HRA, by contrast, is an employer-funded arrangement. Unused HRA balances may carry forward if the plan permits, but they do not automatically become the employee’s personal account.

An HSA also generally requires coverage under a high-deductible health plan. That requirement is different from the rules for an HRA, which depend on the type of HRA and its integration with coverage. An FSA commonly uses a salary-reduction arrangement and may offer a grace period or limited carryover under the plan’s terms. Employers should not describe an HRA as an HSA substitute without considering the coverage and tax implications.

For decision-makers, the comparison is less about choosing a favorite acronym and more about matching the tool to the benefits strategy. An HRA emphasizes employer-defined reimbursements. An HSA emphasizes employee ownership and portability. An FSA can support predictable pre-tax spending for eligible expenses. The right combination depends on the underlying health plan and the employer’s objectives.

How Should Washington Employers Choose Among HRA Types?

Washington employers should start with the business problem, not with a product label. A practical review can follow these steps:

1. Describe the workforce. Consider employee count, full-time and part-time roles, locations, family coverage needs, recruiting priorities, and how much choice employees can realistically manage.
2. Document current coverage. Identify whether the organization offers a traditional group plan, intends to keep its current network, or is evaluating a move toward individual coverage. This immediately narrows the HRA types that may fit.
3. Set the budget framework. Decide whether the priority is a fixed employer contribution, support for deductibles, flexibility across employee classes, or a defined reimbursement limit. The budget should be modeled before the benefit is announced.
4. Evaluate the employee experience. An arrangement that looks efficient on paper can fail if employees do not understand plan selection, eligibility, documentation, or reimbursement timing. Build communication and support into the design.
5. Review administration and compliance. Confirm qualified expenses, notices, nondiscrimination considerations, affordability interactions, and recordkeeping. Plan documents should reflect the actual benefit being offered.
6. Compare the full strategy. Look at HRA options alongside group, self-funded, and level-funded approaches. The goal is a benefits structure that supports cost predictability and employee value, not simply the lowest visible contribution.

Washington Health Insurance Agency (WHIA) works with Washington employers that want a clearer benefits strategy and more control over healthcare costs. Its wholesaler and aggregator model is designed to provide access to plan designs and carrier options that a smaller employer may not reach alone. Learn more about WHIA’s employer benefits approach or review ways to compare employer health insurance plans.

Employers can also review their contribution strategy and group health insurance requirements before selecting an HRA structure. Rules and plan-year requirements matter. Employers should confirm current federal guidance and use qualified benefits support before putting an HRA into operation.

Compare HRA options with a Washington benefits advisor

Frequently Asked Questions About Types of HRA

What are the main types of HRA?

The main types include ICHRA, QSEHRA, group coverage HRA, excepted-benefit HRA, and retiree-only HRA. They differ in eligibility, the type of health coverage involved, contribution rules, and the expenses they can reimburse.

What is an ICHRA?

An ICHRA is an employer-funded arrangement that reimburses eligible employees for individual health insurance premiums and approved medical expenses. Employers of any size may offer one, and employees must have individual coverage to use the funds.

What is a QSEHRA?

A QSEHRA is designed for eligible small employers that do not offer group health coverage. It reimburses qualified expenses up to annual limits, and eligible employees generally receive the same allowance, with permitted differences for self-only and family coverage.

How does a group coverage HRA work?

A group coverage HRA supplements a traditional group health plan by reimbursing approved deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other out-of-pocket expenses. It is different from an ICHRA because it is built around group coverage rather than individual insurance.

Is an HRA the same as an HSA or FSA?

No. An HRA is an employer-funded arrangement. An HSA is an employee-owned account generally connected to a qualifying high-deductible health plan. An FSA is usually funded through salary reduction and follows the employer plan’s rules for eligible expenses and unused funds.

Ready to Compare HRA Options for Your Business?

The best HRA type depends on your employee population, existing coverage, contribution goals, and ability to administer the benefit clearly. A careful comparison can help you avoid choosing an arrangement that looks attractive in isolation but does not fit your workforce or compliance needs.

Book a conversation about your benefits strategy and HRA options